Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2023 - IJCMAS--ICV 2023: 95.56 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer


See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles Volume : 15, Issue : 8, August, 2026

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2026.15(8) : 271-280
DOI : https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2026.1508.025


Distribution of Fresh Pineapple (Ananas comosus MD-2) Biomass at Harvest of the Plant Crop Using Three Planting Materials

D. Zavala1, H. Salas1, J. Delgado1, E. Corrales2 and Mario Araya3*
1LIFE-RID/AMVAC LATAM, 2Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza-CATIE, 3AMVAC Chemical Corporation
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

In three propagative planting materials; stems shoots, slips and crowns, planted and grown in 20 L pots, the fresh pineapple (Ananas comosus MD-2) biomass was determined at harvest of the plant crop. Considering the main plant organs of the shoot system differences in weight of leaves (P< 0.0001), fruit (P< 0.0001) and stem (P< 0.0001) were found among planting materials. Plants coming from crowns showed lower weight of the three variables, differing from plants originating from slips and stem shoots, which were similar. Leaves weight varied between 2480.0 and 3527.5 g, fruit weight between 1264.0 and 1995.0 g, and stem weight between 553.0 and 868.5 g. Plant root weight that oscillated between 374.5 and 487.5 g was similar (P= 0.0914) among the three planting materials. For the stem shoots, a significant positive linear correlation was found between fruit and leaves weight (r = 0.50; P= 0.0238) and between root and leaves weight (r= 0.76; P< 0.0001). Also, a positive linear correlation for the crown plants was found between leaf and fruit weight (r= 0.56; P= 0.0096) as well as between root and leaves weight (r = 0.74; P= 0.0001). The plant organs-fractions contribution to the complete fresh plant biomass at harvest in descending order was: leaves between 2480.0 and 3527.5 g (between 49.4 and 50.1%), fruit between 1264.0 and 1995.0 g (between 25.6 and 28.8%), stem between 553.0 and 868.5 g (between 11.0 and 12.2%), roots between 374.5 and 487.5 g (5.2 and 8.1%), crown between 211.3 and 237.3 g (between 3.0 and 4.9%) and the slips between 11.3 and 94.0 g (between 0.2 and 1.2%). From the main plant organs-fractions (leaves, stem, fruit, roots), roots represent the smallest proportion but are responsible for anchorage, water and nutrients supply, and exchange of various growth substances with the shoots. This emphasizes the necessity to potentialize the maximum genetic expression of the root system of the planting material as well as maintaining its health and conservation. It is known that the pineapple root growth decreases after flower induction, with the maximum root mass reached at anthesis. On the other hand, pineapples roots do not regenerate or produce again if damaged or attacked by pests and diseases, and for those who run the plantation for one or two ratoon crops, it is essential to understand this fact, since their yield depends on the original root system developed during the plant crop.


Keywords: Pineapple, plant organs, fresh biomass, organs distribution, roots, leaves, fruit, stem.


References:

Bartholomew DP. 2018. Crop environment, plant growth and physiology. Pp: 105-142. In: Sanewski G, Bartholomew DP, Paull RE. Eds. The pineapple botany, production and uses. 2nd Edition, CABI.

Bartholomew DP, Kadzimin SB. 1977. Pineapple. Pp: 113–156. In: Alvim PT, Kozlowski TT. Eds Ecophysiology of Tropical Crops. Academic Press, New York,

CANAPEP 2026. https://canapep.com/estadisticas/ (accessed May 8, 2025).

Carr MKV. 2012. The water relations and irrigation requirements on pineapple (Ananas comosus var. comosus): A review. Expl Agric. 14p. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479712000385

Coppens-d´Eeckenbrugge G, Leal F. 2003. Morphology, anatomy and taxonomy. Pp: 13-32. In: Bartholomew DP, Paull RE, Rohrbach KG. Eds. The pineapple: botany, production and uses. CAB International.

Coppens-d´Eeckenbrugge G, Leal F. 2018. Morphology, anatomy and taxonomy. Pp: 11-31. In: Sanewski G, Bartholomew DP, Paull RE. Eds. The pineapple botany, production and uses. 2nd Edition, CABI.

Cruz RHD. 2012. Crecimiento y absorción de nutrientes en piña (Ananas comosus, var. MD-2) en el Trópico Húmedo de Costa Rica. Proyecto de graducación para el título de Ingeniero Agrónomo, Licenciatura en Ciencias Agrícolas. Universidad EARTH, Costa Rica. 35p.

Goodfrey GH. 1936. The pineapple root system as affected by the root-knot nematode. Phytophatology 26: 408-428.

Hernández BGA, Tello De Gracia N. 2011. Crecimiento de piña (Ananas comosus, var. MD-2) en una finca del Trópico Húmedo de Costa Rica. Proyecto de graducación para el título de Ingeniero Agrónomo, Licenciatura en Ciencias Agrícolas. Universidad EARTH, Costa Rica. 19p.

Herrera D, Orozco P, Rojas A, Cortes O, Delgado J, Araya M. 2022. Population dynamics of phytoparasitic nematodes in pineapple (Ananas comosus cv MD-2). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 11(01):274-285. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2022.1101.033

Itai C. 1996. Synthesis of plant growth regulators by roots. Pp: 273-284. In: Plant roots the hidden half. Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U. Eds. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York:

La Republica 2026. Costa Rica es el mayor exportador de piña del mundo. Viernes 8 de mayo 2026.

Malézieux E, Cote F, Bartholomew DP. 2003. Crop environment, plant growth and physiology. Pp: 69-107. In: Sanewski G, Bartholomew DP, Paull RE. Eds. The pineapple botany, production and uses. 2nd Edition, CABI.

Mehlich A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 15(12):1409-1416.

Nurfadhilah ER, Muh B, Purwito TS. 2012. Symphylids control in pineapple fields in Indonesia. Pineapple News 19:39-42.

Paull RE, Duarte O. 2011. Tropical fruits. Volume 1. 2nd Edition. CAB International, UK 400p.

Petty GJ, Stirling GR, Bartholomew DP. 2002. Pests of pineapple. Pp: 157-195. In: Peña JE, Sharp JL, Wysoki M. eds. Tropical fruit pests and pollinators: biology, economic importance, natural enemies and control. CABI Publishing.

Py C, Lacoeuilhe JJ, Teisson C. 1987. The pineapple cultivation and uses. Editions GP. Maisonneuve & Larouse 15, rue Victor-Cousin Paris 568p.

Rabie EC. 2017. Nematode pests of pineapple. Pp: 395-497. In: Fourie H, Spaull VW, Jones RK, Daneel MS, De Waele D. Eds. Nematology in South Africa: A view from the 21st Century.

Rohrbach KG, Johnson MW. 2003. Pests, diseases and weeds. Pp: 203-251. In: Bartholomew DP, Paull RE, Rohrbach KG. eds. The Pineapple Botany, Production and Uses. CABI Publishing.

Rohrbach KG, Apt WJ. 1986. Nematode and disease problems of pineapple. Plant Disease 70(1): 81-87.

Sinclair E. 1993. The Pineapple plant. Pp: 8-10. In: Broadley RH, Wassman RC, Sinclair E. Eds. Pineapple pests and disorders. Information Series QI 92033. Department of Primary Industries. Queensland.

Singh SD, Vaishya K. 2022. Net Assimilation. Pp: 91-103. In: Singh V, Bhayankar NF, Patel A. Eds. Recent Advances in Agronomy. Rubicon Publications, London.

Umble J, Dufour R, Fisher J, Leap J, Van Hrn M. 2006. Symphylans: Soil Pest Management Options. A Publication of ATTRA National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. 15p.

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Zavala D., Salas H., Delgado J., Corrales E. and Mario Araya. 2026. Distribution of Fresh Pineapple (Ananas comosus MD-2) Biomass at Harvest of the Plant Crop Using Three Planting Materials. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 15(8): 271-280 doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2026.1508.025
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license

Citations

"; var printWin = window.open( '', '', 'scrollbars=yes,width=' + w + ',height=' + h + ',top=' + top + ',left=' + left ); printWin.document.write(html); printWin.document.close(); printWin.focus(); printWin.print(); printWin.close(); }