![]() |
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
Maintaining agricultural productivity and environmental health is essential for that optimized soil management practices, targeted fertilization, efficient irrigation, and strategic crop rotation are required. This can be achieved by examining the physical and chemical attributes of soil. The physical aspects like soil texture, structure, porosity, and water retention capacity are critical for supporting plant growth, managing water infiltration, and preventing erosion. The chemical attributes such as pH levels, nutrient availability, cation exchange capacity, and salinity affect how nutrients are accessed and retained by plants. Studying soil properties is vital for maintaining soil health, ensuring food security, and protecting ecological systems. For the same objective, part of Shamli-a north-western district of Uttar Pradesh was selected and soil samples from surface and sub-surface regions were taken for laboratory analysis of the required attributes. The results shows that soil of the region is alkaline with sandy loam texture. To find linear correlations—that is, if an increase in one variable is linked to a reduction in another—between the various physio-chemical qualities, the Pearson's co-relation among them was examined. Understanding that between soil's physical and chemical properties is vital for comprehending soil health and its functionality. These properties interplay to influence soil fertility, structure, and plant support capabilities. For example, soil texture and structure affect water retention and drainage, impacting nutrient availability. Likewise, chemical properties like pH and nutrient content can influence soil structure by affecting aggregate stability. Investigating these correlations allows researchers and farmers to develop improved soil management practices, enhancing agricultural productivity, promoting sustainable land use, and reducing environmental degradation. It is seen that the fertility of the region is not satisfactory implying poor soil health conditions.
Arevalo-Gardini, E., Canto, M., Alegre, J., Loli, O., Julca, A., & Baligar, V. (2015). Changes in soil physical and chemical properties in long term improved natural and traditional agroforestry management systems of cacao genotypes in Peruvian Amazon. PloS one, 10(7), e0132147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132147
Bassirani, N., Abolhassani, M. and Galavi, M. (2011). Distribution of available micronutrients as related to the soil characteristics of Hissar, Haryana (India). African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 6(18): 4239-4242 https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR10.970
Bhanwaria, R., Kameriya, P. K. and Yadav, B. L. (2011). Available Micro nutrient status and their relationship with soil properties of Mokala soil series of Rajasthan. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 59 (4): 392-396.
Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R. (2008). Principles of soil conservation and management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8709-7
Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2017). The Nature and Properties of Soils. Pearson.
Colombo, C., Palumbo, G., He, J. Z., Pinton, R., and Cesco, S. (2014). Review on iron availability in soil: interaction of Fe minerals, plants, and microbes. J. Soils Sediments 14, 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0814-z
Edem, S. O. and Ndaeyo, N. U. (2009). Fertility status and management implications of wetland soils for sustainable crop production in AkwaIbom State, Nigeria. Environmental Development Sustainability. 11: 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-007-9120-5
Havlin, J. L., Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L., & Beaton, J. D. (2014). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Pearson.
Hillel, D. (2008). Soil in the Environment: Crucible of Terrestrial Life. Academic Press.
Kumar, D., Srivastava, M., & Gupta, R. (2019). The role of soil physical and chemical properties in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(4), 345-358.
Kumar, K., Adak, T., Singh, A., Shukla, S. K., and Singh, V. K. (2012). Apprasial of soil fertility, leaf nutrient concentration and yield of Mango (Mangiferaindica L.) at Malihabad region Uttar Pradesh. Current advances in agriculture sciences; 4 (1): 13-19.
Lal, R., & Shukla, M. K. (2004). Principles of Soil Physics. Marcel Dekker.
Moraru, S. S., Ene, A., & Badila, A. (2020). Physical and Hydro-Physical Characteristics of Soil in the Context of Climate Change. A Case Study in Danube River Basin, SE Romania. Sustainability, 12(21), 9174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219174
Musinguzi, Patrick., Peter Ebanyat, John Tenywa, Twaha Ali Basamba, Moses MakoomaTenywa and Drake N. Mubiru (2016). Critical soil organic carbon range for optimal crop response to mineral fertilizer nitrogen on a ferralsol. Experimental Agriculture. 1:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479715000307
Rengel, Z. (2015). The Root Zone: Soil Chemistry and Plant Nutrition. CRC Press.
Sharma, A., & Kumar, V. (2018). An analysis of soil properties and crop yields in the north-western districts of Uttar Pradesh. Agricultural Research Journal, 15(2), 112-125.
Singh, R., Verma, S., & Yadav, P. (2020). Soil physio-chemical characteristics and their impact on agricultural productivity in alluvial regions. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20(3), 233-245.
Sparks, D. L. (2003). Environmental Soil Chemistry. Academic Press.
Weil, R. R., & Brady, N. C. (2016). The Nature and Properties of Soils. Pearson.
Xu, Q., Chu, W., Qiu, H., Fu, Y., Cai, S., and Sha, S. (2013). Responses of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle to zinc: in situ localization, subcellular distribution and physiological and ultrastructural modifications. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 69, 43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.04.018
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |