'' '' ''
![]() |
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692 Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different feeding regimes on hematological profile of crossbred cows. Study was conducted on 18 crossbred cows which were distributed into three treatment groups comprising of 6 animals in each group. Animals of T1 (Farmers’ feeding) group were maintained as per the feeding regime followed by small and marginal farmers. Animals of T2 (Modified feeding) group comprised of feeding with scientific interventions with resources available with farmers. Animals of T3 (Farm feeding) group were fed as per feeding followed at Livestock Research Station. Average WBC count (103/µL) was significantly (p<0.05) more in T3 (7.98±0.12) as compared to T1 (7.43±0.17) and T2 (7.52±0.17) groups. Lymphocyte (103/µL) was maximum in T3 (3.32±0.07), followed by T1 (3.24±0.10) and T2 (3.12±0.09) group but there was no significant difference among treatment groups. Average monocyte (103/µL) level was significantly higher in T3 (0.61±0.01) when compared with T1 (0.57±0.01) and T2 (0.56±0.01) groups. Granulocyte (103/µL) was significantly (p<0.05) higher in T3 (4.05±0.10) as compared to T1 (3.62±0.11) group. However, the value of T2 (3.85±0.12) group was at par with T1 and T3 groups. Average RBC (106/µL) was significantly (p<0.05) more in T3 (6.69±0.08) in comparison to T2 (6.35±0.07) group, whereas, the value of T1 (6.50±0.07) group was at par with T2 and T3 groups. Hb (g/dL) was significantly (p<0.05) higher in T3 (10.54±0.10) as compared to T1 (9.50±0.08) and T2 (9.62±0.10) groups. Average PCV (%) was significantly (p<0.05) higher in T3 (33.71±0.32) when compared with T1 (30.04±0.27) and T2 (30.56±0.35) groups. MCV was 46.73±0.42, 48.32±0.38 and 50.77±0.32 fL in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively which differed significantly (p<0.05) among each other. Average of MCH was 14.80±0.17, 15.30±0.13 and 15.77±0.08 pg in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively which also differed significantly (p<0.05) among each other. MCHC was 31.63±0.15, 31.52±0.12 and 31.22±0.11 g/dL in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively which did not differ significantly among each other. It may be concluded from the present study that WBC, Monocyte, Hb, PCV, MCH and MCHC were significantly (p<0.05) more in T3 as compared to T1 and T2 groups, whereas all the parameters except MCV and MCH in T1 and T2 group were at par which shows that modified feeding did not influence hematological profile. Although the health of animals was at par in all treatment groups, production and reproduction performance was different among the treatment groups.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |