National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
This study aimed to Performance of seven radiation models. The objective was to determine the most accurate model for estimating solar radiation. Performance and Evaluation of all the models on the same basis is prerequisite for selecting an alternative approach in accordance with available data such as air temperature (Tmax, Tmin, Tmean), actual sunshine hours (n), Relative Humidity (Rhmax, Rhmin & RHmean) and potential sunshine hours (N). Therefore, recommended Angstrom-Prescott (A-P) model locally calibrated A-P model, Dogniaux-Lemoine (D-L) model, Glower-Meculloch model, Hargreaves-Samani model (1985),Chen et al. (2004), Ertekin and Yaldiz (1999) and Almorox - Hontoria (2004) radiation based model were used to estimate monthly solar radiation (Rs) at Udaipur(Rajasthan), India. Further, the performance of all these methods were evaluated by regression and error analysis between standard Rs derived using FAO recommended Angstrom-Prescott (A-P) model and Rs values estimated using all the six models, on monthly basis. On monthly basis, Glower-Meculloch model performed best with highest coefficient of determination (1.00) and lowest Root mean square error (0.9089) MJ m−2 day−1. Based on overall results it was concluded that the radiation based model provides average monthly accurate estimate of solar radiation compared to other models.
Citations |
 |
 |
 |
 |
