National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
The symphylids, Scutigerella spp. and Hanseniella spp. are common soil pests in Costa Rican pineapple plantations. These arthropods feed on plant roots causing extensive crop damage which reduces water and nutrient uptake ending in yield reduction. Often, this problem is misdiagnosed since this pest may not be familiar to farmers and technicians. An experiment in a randomized complete block design with four repetitions was conducted to evaluate products for symphylids control. The treatments were: 1: untreated control, 2: commercial chemical treatment with Mocap® 72EC at 10 L ha-1, 3: Thiamethoxam 1.5 kg ha-1, 4: Acetamiprid 1.25 kg ha-1, 5: Steinernema carpocapsae 1 kg ha-1, 6: Spirotetramat 1 L ha-1, 7: Inorganic fertilizer 4 L ha-1, and 8: Biostimulant fertilizer 5 L ha-1 + Quillay extract 4 L ha-1. All rates were applied with spray boom in 3800 L of water solution ha-1 48 days after planting. The pre-treatment incidence of symphylids by 10 plants by repetition was similar (P= 0.3140) among treatments varying between 50 and 80% and the number of symphylids by plant differed (P= 0.0406) which varied between 1.0 and 3.6 by plant. When comparing the treatment effect, the average of the evaluations at 15, 30 and 45 days after product application, the lowest incidence was recorded in the plants applied with Mocap® with 17.5% which differed (P< 0.0001) from all those applied with the other products where it varied between 69.2 and 84.2%. The number of symphylids by plant was lower (P< 0.0001) in those applied with Mocap® with 0.4 differing from the other treatments where the population ranged between 1.9 and 3.0 per plant. When the product effect was compared, pre-application evaluation 0 days versus the average of 15, 30 and 45 days, only in the plants applied with Mocap® the incidence was reduced (P= 0.0084) from 57.5 to 17.5% and the number of symphylids by plant decreased (P= 0.0019) by 83%. Of the products evaluated only Mocap® gave satisfactory control.
Aceves, N. L. A., Juárez, L. J. F., Palma, L. D. J., López, L. R., Rivera, H. B., Gonzáles, M. R. (2005). Estudio para determinar zonas de alta potencialidad del cultivo de piña (Ananas comosus var comosus) en el estado de Tabasco. SAGARPA, Inifap. 83p.
Agredo, R. C. E., Chaparro, A. E., Zuluaga, C. J. I. (1988). Observaciones sobre características, distribucio?n y dan?os de sinfilidos (Symphyla) y otros organismos del suelo en cultivos de pin?a, Ananas comosus. Del Valle. Acta Agron. 38, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag
Araya, M. (2019). Chemical control of symphylids in pineapples. Acta Horticulturae. 1239:167-172. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1239.20
Blaine, M. F. Jr. (1993). Structure and physiological ecology of soil microbial communities. In Soil Microbial Ecology. Applications in Agricultural and Environmental Management. Blaine, M. F. Jr., eds. (New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.), p.3–26.
Bunt, J. A. (1979). Effect and mode of action of the nematicide ethoprophos. Meded. Fac. Landbouwwet. Rijksuniv. Gent 44, 357–365.
Das, A. C., Chakravarty, A., Sukul, P., Mukherjee, D. (2003). Influence and persistence of phorate and carbofuran insecticides on microorganisms in rice field. Chemosphere 53 (8), 1033–1037 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00713-6. PubMed
Devine, G. J., Eza, D., Ogusuku, E., Furlong, M. J. (2008). Uso de insecticidas: contexto y consecuencias ecolo?gicas. Rev. Peru. Med. Exp. Salud Publica 25, 74–100.
Gerdeman, B. and Diehl, B. (2022). Biology and control of the garden Symphyla. In N. Kaur (Ed.), Pacific Northwest insect management handbook (pp. N12-N14). Oregon State University.
Jime?nez, D. J. A. (1999). Cultivo de la Pin?a (Cartago: Editorial Tecnolo?gica de Costa Rica, Instituto Tecnolo?gico de Costa Rica), pp.224.
Jordan, E. G., Montecalvo, D. M., Norris, F. A. (1986). Metabolism of Ethoprop in soil. Abstract presented at: 192nd National Meeting of the American Chemical Society (Anaheim, CA: American Chemical Society).
Kéhé M.. 1979. Les symphyles en culture d'ananas en Côte d'Ivoire. In : Congrès sur la lutte contre les insectes en milieu tropical, Marseille, 13-16 mars 1979. Première partie : Cultures tropicales. Deuxième partie : Santé humaine et animale. CCIM. Marseille : CCI, pp. 441-448. Congrès sur la lutte contre les insectes en milieu tropical, Marseille, France, 13 March 1979/19 March 1979.
Ke?he?, M., Gnonhouri, Ph., Adikoko, A. (1997). Time course of infestation by Hanseniella ivorensis (symphilid) and Pratylenchus brachyurus (nematode) on pineapple crop in Co?te d’Ivoire. Acta Hortic. 425, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.425.50
Lacoeuilhe, J. (1997) Le concept d’attachement à la marque dans la formation du comportement de fidélité. Revue Francaise du Marketing, 165, 29-42.
Madigan, M. T., Martinko, J. M., Stahl, D. A., Clark, D. P. (2012). Biology of Microorganisms (Benjamin Cummings), pp.1155.
Montes, R. J. M., Ossa, Y. J. F. (2021). Sampling methods of symphylids in pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) crops in Santander, Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana 39(2):208-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v39n2.93587
Morales, M. R. (2006). Manejo de nema?todos fitoparas??ticos utilizando productos naturales y biolo?gicos. Thesis (Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto Universitario de Mayaguez), 80p.
Murray, D. A. H., Smith, D. (1983). Effect of symphylan, Hanseniella sp., on establishment of pineapples in south-east Queensland. Queensl. J. Agric. Anim. Sci 40, 121–123.
Nurfadhilah, E. R., Muh, B., Purwito, T. S. (2012). Symphylids control in pineapple fields in Indonesia. Pineapple News 19, 39–42. http://www.ishs-horticulture.org/workinggroups/pineapple/PineNews19.pdf.
Petty, G. J., Stirling, G. R., Bartholomew, D. P. (2002). Pests of pineapple. In Tropical Fruit Pests and Pollinators: Biology, Economic Importance, Natural Enemies and Control. Pen?a, J. E., Sharp, J. L., Wysoki, M. eds. (CABI Publishing), p.157–195. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994345.0157.
Pineapple News. (1997). News from Australia. Mocap in pineapples for control of symphylan and nematodes. Pineapple News III 1. http://www.ishs-horticulture.org/workinggroups/pineapple/PineNews04.pdf.
Pinto da Cunha, G. A., Santos, C. J. R., Da Silva, S. L. F. (1999). O abacaxizeiro cultivo, Agroindustria e econom??a (Brasilia, DF: Embrapa Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria, Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura, Ministerio de Agricultura e do Abastecimento), 480p.
Py, C., Lacoeuilhe, J. J., Teisson, C. (1987). The Pineapple Cultivation and Uses (Paris, France: Editions G.P. Maisonneuve & Larose), pp.568.
Rebolledo, M. A., Uriza, A. D. E., Del Ángel, P. A. L., Rebolledo, M. L., Zetina, L. R. (2011). La pin?a y su cultivo en Me?xico: Cayena Lisa y MD2. Libro Te?cnico No 27 (Medell??n de Bravo, Veracruz: Centro de Investigacio?n Regional Golfo Centro, Campo Experimental Cotaxtla), pp.306.
Rebolledo, M. M. C. A., Uriza, A. D. E., Rebolledo, M. M. C. L. (1998). Tecnolog??a para la produccio?n de pin?a en Me?xico (Campo Experimental Papaloapan, Veracruz, Me?xico: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agr??colas y Pecuarias, Centro de Investigacio?n Regional Golfo Centro), pp.159.
Reyes, M. J. J., Uriza, A. D. E., Rebolledo, M. L., Rebolledo, M. A. (2005). Paquete Tecnolo?gico sobre cultivo de la Pin?a en Oaxaca. Tecnolog??a para el Cultivo de Pin?a en Oaxaca (AGROproduce), setiembre, 9–24.
Rohrbach, K. G. and Apt, W. J. (1986). Nematode and disease problems of pineapple. Plant Disease 70(1):81-87. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-70-81
Rohrbach, K. G., Johnson, M. W. (2003). Pests, diseases, and weeds. In The Pineapple Botany, Production and Uses. Bartholomew, D. P., Paull, R. E., and Rohrbach, K. G. eds. (CABI Publishing), p.203–251. https://doi.org/10.1079/97808519950 38.0203
Smelt, J. H., Leistra, M. (1992). Availability, movement and (accelerated) transformation of soil-applied nematicides. In Nematology from Molecule to Ecosystem, F.J. Gommers, and PWTh. Maas, eds. (European Society of Nematologists, Inc.), Pp:266–280.
Soler, A., Gaudem, J. M., Marie-Alphonsine, P. A., Vinatier, F., Dole, B., Govindin, J. C., Fournier, P., Queneherve, P. (2011). Development and evaluation of a new method for sampling and monitoring the symphylids population in pineapple. Pest Management Science, 67(9), 1169-1177. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2170
Umble, J., Dufour, R., Fisher, J., Leap, J., Van Horn, M. (2006). Symphylans: Soil Pest Management Options (ATTRA National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service), pp.15.
Waite, G. R. (1993). Pests. In Pineapple Pests and Disorders. R.H. Broadley, Wassman, R. C. and Sinclair, E. eds. Information Series QI92033 (Queensland, Australia: Department of Primary Industries), p.21–32.
Walker, G. E. (2007). Effects of organic amendments, fertilizers and fenamiphos on parasitic and free-living nematodes, tomato growth and yield. Nematol. Mediterr. 35, 131–136.
Citations |
 |
 |
 |
 |
