Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
Home Editorial Board Current Issue Special Issue Archives Indexing Submit Article
Instruction to Authors Manuscript Charges Copyright Form Model Manuscript Process Flow (Time Frame) FAQ
Reviewer Guidelines Selection of Reviewers Join our Team of Reviewers Apply as Reviewer Reviewer Login
Editorial Review Policy Embargo Policy Ethical Expectations Consent For Identifying Information Informed Consent Manuscript Withdrawal Policy Peer Review Process Plagiarism Policy Ethical Violations Appeal Policy Against Editorial Decision Advertising Policies Authorship Policy
Access Policies Authorship Publication Policy Publication Ethics Complaints Policy Confidential Information Conflicts of Interest Policy Consent for Copyrighted Material Copyright Policy Corrections and Retractions Digital Preservation Policy Research On Human And Animal Studies Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics Contact
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2022 - IJCMAS--ICV 2022: 95.28 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Join as a Reviewer

Login as a Reviewer

Indexed in



National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS)
NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020)
[Effective from January 1, 2020]
For more details click here
ICV 2022: 95.28
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2022 - IJCMAS--ICV 2022: 95.28
For more details click here
Announcement

See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles                      Volume : 9, Issue:7, July, 2020
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com /
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38
Metrics and citations

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2020.9(7): 1167-1190
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.136


Non parametric Measures of Stability Compared as per BLUP and BLUE of Wheat Genotypes Evaluated in North Western Plains Zone of the Country
Ajay Verma* and G.P. Singh
ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat & Barley Research, Post Bag # 158 Agrasain Marg, Karnal 132001 (Haryana), India
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

Non parametric measures as per the BLUP values of original yield for first year, Sis measures identified G11, G10, G4 as stable genotypes. Corrected yield measures CSis selected G11, G12, G8 for stable performance. Values of NPi(s) identified G4, G10, G11as desirable genotypes. Association analysis among measures observed positive correlations of Sis, with others and of negative with CMR, Z1 and Z2. Positive relationships exhibited by CSis measures. Negative relationships of NPi(s) expressed with Z1 and Z2 only. Biplot analysis showed CMed& CMR expressed close affinity with SD, NPi(3), NPi(4) & Siswhereas CCV, CSD, NPi(1) associated with CSisalong with Z1. Based on BLUE’s of genotypes yield, measures SisfoundG4, G8, G12as suitable genotypes. CSis identified G4, G8, G11, G12, as opposed to G4, G5, G8, G11by measures NPi(s)measures. Positive correlations exhibited by Sis except of negative with CMR, Z1 and Z2. Measures CSis expressed highly significant indirect relationship with Z2 only. Negative relationships of NPi(s) had observed with Z2 only. CV expressed affinity with CMR, Si3, Si6, NPi(2), NPi(3) & NPi(4) whereas SD grouped with Si1, Si2, Si4, Si5, Si7 measures. BLUP’s of genotypes for second year of study seen, measures Sis settled forG1, G9, G13, G15 genotypes. While NPi(1) identified G9, G11,G14 and G15genotypes of stable performance. Measures CMR and Z2 showed negative correlations with Sis, and CSis, behaved in direct manner along with indirect to Z2.Negative relationships of NPi(s) exhibited with Z1 and Z2. CV along with CMR expressed affinity with, SD, CMed, NPi(2), NPi(3), NPi(4), Si3, Si5, Si6. Large cluster comprises of CCV, CSD, NPi(1), Si1, Si2, Si4, CSi1, CSi2, CSi3, CSi4, CSi5, CSi6, CSi7 and Z1measures. Sis non parametric while considering BLUE’s values of genotypes pointed towards G5, G9, G14 whereas G6,G9 by CSis values. .Wheat genotypes G5,G9, G14,G15 settled by least values of NPi(s) . Indirect relations with Z2 only exhibited by Sis measures. CSis maintained positive relationships. NPi(s)had positive relationships with others and negative relationships with Z2 only. Largest cluster consists of SD, CSD, CCV, NPi(1), Si1 , Si4, Si5 , Si7 , CSi1 ,CSi2 ,CSi3 ,CSi4 ,CSi5 ,CSi6 ,CSi7 measures.


Keywords: BLUP, BLUE, Si(s), CSi(s), NPi(s), Coefficient of concordance, Biplot analysis

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Ajay Verma and Singh, G.P. 2020. Non parametric Measures of Stability Compared as per BLUP and BLUE of Wheat Genotypes Evaluated in North Western Plains Zone of the Country.Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(7): 1167-1190. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.136
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

Citations
Home | Terms of Use | Copyright Form 2012-2020 Copy rights reserved IJCMAS. Powered by ThinkNEXT Technologies