|
PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706 Issues : 12 per year Publisher : Excellent Publishers Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com / submit@ijcmas.com Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39 NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38 |
Profitable agriculture could be achieved through diversified farming system. High economic return could be obtained only with the inclusion of animal husbandry. Border row horticulture system is recommended in the intensive fodder production system. The study was conducted during 2017-2018 in field no.23. Cumbu Napier hybrid grass was cultivated as per cultivation techniques. Coconut and Jack fruit trees were maintained as borders rows of Cumbu Napier hybrid grass. As per the study, it could be concluded that the yield of Cumbu Napier Hybrid grass was significantly increased in open system to the tune of 5.96 percent compared to the treatment (with boarder rows of coconut). This might be due to shading effect of nine years old coconut palm. Whereas, in Jackfruit boarder row system there is no significant reduction in the yield of Cumbu Napier Hybrid grass. Hence, boarder row system of Jackfruit with regular pruning interval of three months could be recommended in the agroforestry system.
Distel R A, Arroquy J I, Lagrange S and Villalba J J 2020 Designing diverse agricultural pastures for improving ruminant production systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 215 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.596869
Keir B, Dinh Van Bien, Preston, T. R. and Orskov, E. R. 1997. Nutritive value of leaves from tropical trees and shrubs Intake; growth and digestibility studies with goat, Livestock Research for Rural Development.
Kenneth R. Allison, John J.M. Dwyer, Susan Makin. 1999. Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity among High School Students, Preventive Medicine, 28(6): 608-615. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0489
Kouch T, Preston T R and Ly J 2003 Studies on utilization of trees and shrubs as the sole feedstuff by growing goats; foliage preferences and nutrient utilization. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 15, #50. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/7/kouc157.htm
Maleko D, Mwilawa A, Msalya G, Pasape L and Mtei K 2019 Forage growth, yield and nutritional characteristics of four varieties of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) in the west Usambara highlands, Tanzania. Scientific African. 6, e00214 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00214
Mohan Kumar, B. and T. K. Kunhamu, 2022. Nature-based solutions in agriculture: A review of the coconut (Cocos nucifera L.)-based farming systems in Kerala, “the Land of Coconut Trees” Nature-Based Solutions 2. Published by Elsevier Inc.pp1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100012.
Mui N T, Ledin I, Udén P and Binh D V 2002. The foliage of flemingia (Flemingia macrophylla) or jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) as a substitute for a rice bran - soya bean concentrate in the diet of lactating goats. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 15(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.5713/AJAS.2002.45
Oliveira J K S D, Corrêa D C D C, Cunha A M Q, Rêgo A C D, Faturi C, Silva W L D and Domingues F N 2020 Effect of nitrogen fertilization on production, chemical composition and morphogenesis of Guinea grass in the humid tropics. Agronomy, 10(11), 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111840
Pal K, Patra A K, Sahoo A and Kumawat P K 2015 Evaluation of several tropical tree leaves for methane production potential, degradability and rumen fermentation in vitro. Livestock Science, 180, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.07.011
Pamo T.E., Kennang T.B.A., Kangmo M.V.2001. Etude comparée des performances pondérales des chèvres Naines de Guinée supplémentées au Leucaena leucocephala, au Gliricidia sepium ou au tourteau de coton dans l’Ouest Cameroun. Tropicultura, 19: 10-14.22.
Van DTT, Mui NT, Ledin I. 2005. Tropical foliages: effect of presentation method and species on intake by goats. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 118:1–17.
Vijayakumar, G.., G C. Babu, K. Velayudham and T. S. Raveendran. 2009. A High Yielding Cumbu Napier Hybrid Grass CO (CN) 4. Madras Agric. J., 96 (7-12): 291-292.