Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2022 - IJCMAS--ICV 2022: 95.28 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer


See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles                      Volume : 12, Issue:12, December, 2023

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com /
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2023.12(12): 207-222
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2023.1212.024


Assessment of Physicochemical, Sensory and Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk and Reconstituted Milk as Feedstock for Dairy Units in Dori, Burkina Faso
Joseph B. Sawadogo1,2*, Clarisse S. Compaoré3, Soudah Boma4, Dimitri P. D. Taminy1, Alfred S. Traoré2, Dayéri Dianou5 and Aboubacar Toguyeni6
1UFR-SVT, Université Nazi BONI, 01 BP 1091 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso 2Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, 03 BP 7131 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso 3DTA, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST), 03 BP 7047 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso 4Institut Togolais de Recherche Agronomique, BP 1163, Lomé, Togo. 5CNRST, 03 BP 7192 Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso 6IDR, Université Nazi BONI, 01 BP 1091 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

This study aimed to assess the physicochemical, sensory, and hygienic quality of milk destined for dairy processing units in Dori. Raw milk (n=10) derived from 10 farm-milking cows. Reconstituted milk (n=10) was powder milk added with water at 1/5, 1/7, 1/8, and 1/10 (kg/L), respectively. Physicochemical and microbiological parameters and sensory perception were analyzed. Results showed pH was unsuitable in raw milk (6.30) and reconstituted milk (6.28). The acidity (16.90°D), density (1.032), non-fat dry matter (9.34%), fat (3.91%), lactose (5.13%), and protein (3.42%) contents were by standards in 90-100% of raw milk against 7.5-20% of reconstituted milk. Raw milk was more satisfactory sensory quality than reconstituted milk. However, 90-100% of raw milk was poor sanitary quality regarding total aerobic mesophilic flora, negative-coagulase staphylococci, yeasts and molds (4.35x106, 1.12x106 and 1.48x103 CFU/mL, respectively), whereas 70-100% was acceptable quality to total and fecal coliforms (1.25x103and 6.84x102 CFU/mL, respectively). Conversely, 100% of reconstituted milk was poor quality regarding total and fecal coliforms (3.88x104, 4.39x103 CFU/g, respectively). These analyses highlight potentially hazardous products that can pose a serious public health risk and spoil the quality of end-products of dairy units if the milk is not adequately processed and highly adulterated by adding water.


Keywords: Raw cow milk, reconstituted milk, physicochemical properties, sensory perception, sanitary quality, milk adulteration

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Joseph B. Sawadogo, Clarisse S. Compaoré, Soudah Boma, Dimitri P. D. Taminy, Alfred S. Traoré, Dayéri Dianou and Aboubacar Toguyeni. 2023. Assessment of Physicochemical, Sensory and Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk and Reconstituted Milk as Feedstock for Dairy Units in Dori, Burkina Faso.Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 12(12): 207-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2023.1212.024
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

Citations