Follow
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS)
IJCMAS is now DOI (CrossRef) registered Research Journal. The DOIs are assigned to all published IJCMAS Articles.
Index Copernicus ICI Journals Master List 2022 - IJCMAS--ICV 2022: 95.28 For more details click here
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) : NAAS Score: *5.38 (2020) [Effective from January 1, 2020] For more details click here

Login as a Reviewer


See Guidelines to Authors
Current Issues
Download Publication Certificate

Original Research Articles                      Volume : 6, Issue:3, March, 2017

PRINT ISSN : 2319-7692
Online ISSN : 2319-7706
Issues : 12 per year
Publisher : Excellent Publishers
Email : editorijcmas@gmail.com /
submit@ijcmas.com
Editor-in-chief: Dr.M.Prakash
Index Copernicus ICV 2018: 95.39
NAAS RATING 2020: 5.38

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.2017.6(3): 769-777
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.089


Performance of Green Super Rice 5 Genotype under Different Water Management Schemes
Michael M. Uy1 and Samuel R. Simon2*
1Cagayan State University, Piat Campus, Piat, 3527 Cagayan, Philippines
2Isabela State University, Cabagan Campus, Cabagan, 3328 Isabela Philippines
*Corresponding author
Abstract:

The study was conducted to determine the effect of different water management schemes on the growth and yield of green super rice 5 (GSR 5) genotype. The experiment was laid out using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to test the following treatments: Treatment 1 – Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD); Treatment 2 – Continuous Flooding (CF); and Treatment 3 – Field Capacity (FC).The GSR 5 subjected to different water management schemes revealed comparable data in almost all agronomic and yield traits as it exhibited no significant differences in terms of number of days to 50% flowering, number of days to maturity, height at maturity (cm), number of productive tillers, panicle length (cm), filled and unfilled grains, biomass yield (g), weight of 1000 grains (g) and grain yield per hectare. However, in terms of root length, Treatment 1 significantly obtained the longest. Even with insignificant variations among the three water management schemes, alternate wetting and drying revealed better results compared with the other treatments in most of the parameters considered. Moreover, the reduction in the frequency of water application in AWD scheme resulted to a significant decrease in the cost of irrigation without significant reduction in the yield. Hence, the application of AWD scheme is recommended for GSR 5 production.


Keywords: Green super rice, alternate wetting and drying, water management scheme, continuous flooding,field capacity.

Download this article as Download

How to cite this article:

Michael M. Uy and Samuel Simon, R. 2017. Performance of Green Super Rice 5 Genotype under Different Water Management Schemes.Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(3): 769-777. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.089
Copyright: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license.

Citations